• Партнер

  • A recent survey conducted by Tufin Technologies, a provider of firewall
    management software, finds that of the 242 IT professionals working at companies
    with over 1,000 employees, 30 percent said they audited their firewall security
    only once in every five plus years. So when those systems are ultimately
    compromised, and then used to harm systems elsewhere, who should be liable?
    Obviously, the perpetrator of the crime is primarily responsible. But shouldn't
    the organization that failed to take reasonable security measure carry some
    burden of the blame?

    Подписаться
    Уведомить о
    0 комментариев
    Межтекстовые Отзывы
    Посмотреть все комментарии